Is there an imagination deficit in associations today?
I’ve been thinking about this difficult question for quite some time now, but I’ve been reluctant to write about it out of a genuine concern that the question itself might sound like an unprovoked attack on hard-working association staff and volunteers. This is definitely not my intention. Rather, I’m hoping we can make our colleagues’ lives a bit easier by creating a more favorable climate in which they can always bring their imagination to bear on the work of their organizations.
Albert Einstein suggested that “imagination is more important than knowledge,” and who am I to disagree with him. In a time of paradigm shift, what we think we know is increasingly less useful than what we can learn, imagine and create. In a recent post, Micropersuasion blogger Steve Rubel suggested that “the most important ‘tool’ you can have today in business is insatiable curiosity. The minute you lose it, you’re dead.” I think Steve is right on target and, from my perspective, curiosity and imagination go hand in hand: our curiosity feeds our imagination, and our imagination drives our curiosity.
Which brings me back to my inquiry about the possible imagination deficit in our community. I suppose what I’m really wondering is whether the work environment in associations today cultivates and nurtures the curiosity and imagination of staff and volunteers. One specific source of concern in this regard is the recent emphasis placed on so-called “data-driven strategies,” as advocated by ASAE & The Center’s 7 Measures of Success report. Without a doubt, there is a need to infuse the strategic decision-making process with useful data. But we must also recognize there are limits to what data can tell us, and there is good reason to challenge the notion that backward-looking information will always illuminate the wisest course of action for the future of our organizations. Associations definitely need clear, simple and focused strategy, but it should be “driven” by the value it will create for members, customers and stakeholders. Identifying and implementing that potential value necessarily will involve some combination of what we know, what we can learn, what we can imagine and what we can create together.
The powerful forces of paradigm shift are reshaping our society, and associations are going along for that very bumpy ride. But in the midst of this uncertainty, association professionals and volunteers have an extraordinary opportunity to envision a very different and more vibrant future for the organizations to which they have committed themselves. I challenge you to do just that by remaining curious and using your imagination everyday. If you’re able to do that, then in time the more important question won’t be whether there once was an imagination deficit, but what we did to eliminate it for the benefit of our community.






Jeff, I have some more thoughts on this over on my blog.
[…] As long as I’m pointing you to my posts on other blogs, don’t forget to check out my thoughts on the association’s community’s imagination deficit on the We Have Always Done It That Way blog. And be sure to read Ben’s additional perspectives, which are right on target. […]
Three years ago, John Cleese predicted the decline of the U.S. (brash man that he is) because of an increasing lack of “active, wide-ranging” curiousity in the world around us.
This is really a comment on data driven strategies, not on innovation per se.
I think you need both, though I think that “data driven” is an incorrect term since data should not be driving strategy.
My real point is that you do need data — you should be able to say, for example, whether or not the money you spend actually relates to what you are attempting to accomplish.
In the IT management world this is sometimes referred to as “aligning IT resources with strategic objectives.” If 4 out of 5 of your 3-year plan’s goals relate to member services, yet 70% of you budget isn’t going to member services (I’m making these numbers up) shouldn’t you know this type of fact as a matter of course? And be able to explain it?
Again, I’m not de-emphasizing innovation. I just think that keeping your finger on the pulse of what your organization is doing involves not only innovation but also knowing where money and resources are going — and that takes data.